If you have problems viewing this email go to http://www.publicforuminstitute.org/nde/news/nde-news.htm



Week of September 15 - 21, 2008


The Next President and the Entrepreneurial Economy

Current polls show the race between Barack Obama and John McCain to be amazingly close. So how will this historic election influence America’s standing in the global economy and its ability to compete? What specific policies will the new administration pursue, and how will they affect America's entrepreneurs and business owners? A live webcast from the Inc. 500/5000 Conference, moderated by Kauffman Foundation president and CEO Carl Schramm, will feature key economic advisers to the two candidates. Jason Furman, director of economic policy for the Obama campaign, and Doug Holtz-Eakin, director of economic policy for the McCain campaign, will provide insights into the candidates' thoughts and plans regarding taxes, job creation, credit, innovation, immigration policy, education, the SBA, and other issues that are critical to the growth and success of small and medium-size businesses over the next four years and beyond.

The webcast will take place on Friday, September 19 from 4:45 – 5:45 pm ET. Login at www.kauffman.org/economicpolicy


Competitiveness: Where Does America Stand?

Earlier this year, NDE-news reported on a RAND Corporation study, U.S. Competitiveness in Science and Technology, that took a somewhat contrarian stand by arguing that concerns about America’s economic competitiveness were overblown. A new Information Technology and Innovation Policy Foundation (ITIF) report counters the optimistic scenarios painted by the RAND researchers. The report, entitled “RAND’s Rose-Colored Glasses,” claims that the earlier RAND research contains numerous analytical flaws. The ITIF study does not dispute that the US currently leads the world in many key science and technology sectors. However, it contends that this lead is eroding and that RAND’s research fails to account for these trends. The ITIF report provides a number of detailed analytical critiques of RAND’s research, but all of these rejoinders are based on a common theme. By downplaying current problem areas, RAND’s research contributes to a sense of complacency. As a result, policymakers may be lulled into a continuation of the status quo, as opposed to introducing new initiatives and new investments that are required to bolster America’s future innovation capacity.

Download the September 2008 Information Technology and Innovation Policy Foundation report, “RAND’s Rose-Colored Glasses: How RAND’s Report on U.S. Competitiveness in Science and Technology Gets it Wrong,” by Stephen J. Ezell and Robert D. Atkinson.


America’s Best Performing Metros

The latest edition of the Milken Institute’s Best Performing Cities report was released earlier this month, and, as usual, Southern and Western cities top the list. The Milken analysis places a heavy emphasis on a region’s recent job growth. This year’s analysis tracks performance between 2002 and 2007, and also includes a separate measure that tracks job growth up to March 2008. As such, the report does a good job of trying to assess how regions are dealing with some of the impact of the current economic downturn. This year’s top performing metro area is Provo-Orem, Utah. Other top performers (in rank order) are: Raleigh-Durham, NC; Salt Lake City, UT; Austin-Round Rock, TX: and Huntsville, AL. The best performing small metro areas also hail from the South and the West. They are (in rank order): Midland, TX; Coeur d’Alene, ID; Bend, OR; St. George, UT; and Grand Junction, CO.

Learn more about the 2008 Milken Institute Best Performing Cities report.


Supporting Innovation in Services

When most people think of innovation, they tend to think of science, technology, or manufacturing, i.e. the development of new products or technologies. But, innovation in services is also an important, and poorly understood, part of an entrepreneurial economy. A new study from within Great Britain’s Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR), examines the drivers of innovation in five key service sectors: retail, logistics, construction, environmental, and Internet-delivered content services. Together, these five sectors represent roughly 25% of the British economy, so innovations could have a huge spin-off effect. The study describes three big changes affecting service industries: (1) The convergence of manufacturing and service innovation where many firms add a “service wrapper” (e.g. post-sales maintenance and support) to the sale of a manufactured product; (2) The growing role of users and consumers in the innovation process; and, (3) Growing concerns about sustainability and the environment. In this changed climate, businesses must look to innovate in all aspects of their operations. On the government side, agencies must enhance investments in critical areas such as information technology and waste management, support advanced training in innovative business processes, and expand the availability of financing to smaller service businesses that are seeking to develop new innovative processes and tools.

Download the 2008 report, Supporting Innovation in Services, by BERR's Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills (DIUS).


The Power of Equity Sharing

Several new papers sponsored by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) examine the impact of shared capitalism compensation schemes, such as stock options and employee stock ownership programs (ESOPs) on company performance. As part of the NBER Shared Capitalism research project, the researchers surveyed workers in fourteen companies that actively use these compensation practices. They found that greater involvement in the programs generally led to higher job satisfaction, higher pay and benefits, and greater job security. A second study of more than 200 worksites found that these compensation programs also contribute to better innovation outcomes. These systems seem to play an important role in building a company-wide innovation culture and in stimulating participation in innovation activities.

Access the August 2008 National Bureau of Economic Research Working Papers, “Who Has a Better Idea? Innovation, Shared Capitalism, and HR Policies,” (#14234), by Erika Harden, Douglas S. Kruse, and Joseph R. Blasi, and “Do Workers Gain by Sharing? Employee Outcomes under Employee Ownership, Profit Sharing, and Broad-Based Stock Options,” (#14233), by Douglas Kruse, Richard Freeman, and Joseph R. Blasi. Paper abstracts are available; the full articles are available for purchase.


The National Dialogue on Entrepreneurship is an initiative of the Public Forum Institute made possible by a grant from the Kauffman Foundation of Kansas City. Through NDE-news, we bring you short summaries and analyses of various trends driving entrepreneurship around the world. Subscribe now to receive your weekly copy. Archived issues are available online.


Kauffman Foundation The Public Forum Institute

National Dialogue on Entrepreneurship

Mark Marich, Editor

All stories © 2008 The Public Forum Institute
Content from this newsletter may be reproduced for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution to the National Dialogue on Entrepreneurship and a link to www.publicforuminstitute.org/nde.