If you have problems viewing this email go to http://www.publicforuminstitute.org/nde/news/nde-news.htm



Week of January 21-27, 2008


Final 2007 Venture Capital Numbers

While venture capitalists (VCs) are focused on finding new investments for 2008, their trade association, the National Venture Capital Association (NVCA), is compiling and releasing the final statistics for 2007. Over the past several weeks, NVCA and Thomson Financial have released several compilations of 2007 VC data. In general, 2007 was a decent year, showing slight increases from 2006 figures. On the fundraising end, VCs raised $34.7 billion (for 235 funds) in 2007. This total represents a slight increase over 2006 (up 2.6% in dollar value), but the total is the highest level since the dot-com era in 2001. In addition, the market for exits--via mergers and acquisitions (M&As) or initial public offerings (IPOs)--also seemed to pick up. The total number of IPOs in 2007 was the highest since 2004. Eighty-six venture-backed firms went public last year, raising a total of $10.3 billion. Meanwhile, there were 305 venture-backed M&A transactions, which raised a total of $25.4 billion. This dollar value was the highest reported total since 2000. Industry observers expressed satisfaction with these trends, while also expressing hope that the industry can enjoy a similar performance in 2008.

View the latest statistics on US venture capital investment, visit www.nvca.org


Infrastructure Needs for the Biotech Industry

As biotechnology advances and a major biopharmaceutical industry evolves in the US, these firms and the industry at large will generate unique infrastructure demands on Federal, state and local governments. New research sponsored by the National Institute of Standards and Technology takes a closer look at the future needs and the present state of the biopharmaceutical industry’s technological infrastructure. Technology infrastructure is a broad concept that includes equipment, tools, data, and methods needed to develop new technologies and products. The new research indicates that the industry now spends a whopping $1.2 billion each year on its technology infrastructure. Within this total, $884 million supports drug-related R&D and $335 million supports commercial manufacturing and other activities. To their credit, the researchers did not simply seek to tally up these costs. They also sought to estimate the benefits of major efficiency gains in this technology infrastructure. While the projections differ depending on specific individual circumstances, the researchers estimate potential savings in the range of 10-40% thanks to major improvements in key areas such as gene expression analysis, biomonitors, and bioinformatics.

Download the November 2007 National Institutes of Technology report (Planning Report 07-01), Economic Analysis of the Technological Infrastructure Needs of the U.S. Biopharmaceutical Industry, prepared by RTI International.


Supporting Generation Iowa

Like many Midwestern states, Iowa faces some major demographic challenges. Its workforce is rapidly aging, and future workforce shortages loom. Meanwhile, many of Iowa’s younger and more educated workers leave the state for opportunities in larger metropolitan areas. Iowa’s leaders have been thinking about how to address these challenges. As part of this effort, the Iowa Legislature created the Generation Iowa Commission, composed of young leaders between the ages of 18 and 35, to offer recommendations on how Iowa can better nurture, attract and retain young professionals. The Commission has recently published its final report that contains lots of useful ideas for how Iowa--or other communities--could make itself more attractive to Generations X, Y, and beyond. The Commission’s recommendations include proposals to raise wages for younger workers (via revised tax incentives for the creation of higher paying jobs), reduce student debt loads (through a higher education tax credit, and a student loan repayment assistance program), expand local job opportunities (through a state job and internship exchange, and government procurement preferences for young entrepreneurs), and to improve the quality of life for young Iowans through expanded arts, culture, and recreation initiatives.

Learn more about the Generation Iowa Commission and its recommendations.


Globalization and the European Union: Who Can Cope Best?

A new Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) research paper examines how various European Union countries are equipped to cope with globalization through flexible labor market policies, effective innovation frameworks, and high quality education and workforce systems. The study includes some interesting findings. Western European countries, especially the Scandinavian nations, are well-situated to prosper from globalization. Italy is one exception to this generalization, as its export mix competes with (as opposed to complementing) the mix found in China and other developing economies. Southern and Eastern European countries will be similarly challenged as they will compete with developing economies for low-wage assembly jobs in global supply chains. The research also indicates that intra-European trade might fall in coming years, as more established European economies opt to trade with the developing world as opposed to their less competitive European neighbors. Finally, several large European economies, namely France and Italy, are poorly equipped to adjust to globalization-related shocks. This results from weaknesses in labor and product markets. Southern and Eastern European countries will also be challenged on this front due to poor human capital development capacity.

Download the 2007 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Economics Department Working Paper (No. 586), “Globalization and the European Union: Which Countries are Best Placed to Cope?” by Dave Rae and Marte Sollie.


Science and Technology Earmarks Return with a Vengeance

A Government budgets in fiscal year 2007 were relatively earmark-free, thanks to agreement between Congressional budget negotiators. The same cannot be said about the recently passed FY 2008 appropriations bills where earmarks and pork barrel spending are clearly back in fashion. A new analysis from the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) examines the impact of earmarks on Federal research and development (R&D) budgets. It identifies a total of $4.5 billion in Federal R&D earmarks, supporting 2,526 different projects, in various FY 2008 appropriations bills. Spending patterns seem to differ across federal agencies. Both the Departments of Energy and Agriculture have a great deal of earmarks in their research budgets. Meanwhile, the National Science Foundation and National Institutes of Health budgets are relatively earmark-free. Not surprisingly, earmarks also follow a distinctive regional pattern. Ten states--led by California, Mississippi, and Pennsylvania--receive 44% of all R&D earmarks. These states tend to be a mix of the most populous and those who are represented by key Appropriations Committee and Subcommittee chairmen.

Access the January 2008 American Association for the Advancement of Science report, “R&D Earmarks Total $4.5 Billion in 2008.”


The National Dialogue on Entrepreneurship is an initiative of the Public Forum Institute made possible by a grant from the Kauffman Foundation of Kansas City. Through NDE-news, we bring you short summaries and analyses of various trends driving entrepreneurship around the world. Subscribe now to receive your weekly copy. Archived issues are available online.


Kauffman Foundation The Public Forum Institute

National Dialogue on Entrepreneurship

Mark Marich, Editor

All stories © 2008 The Public Forum Institute
Content from this newsletter may be reproduced for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution to the National Dialogue on Entrepreneurship and a link to www.publicforuminstitute.org/nde.