|
If
you encounter problems viewing this email go to http://www.publicforuminstitute.org/nde/news/nde-news.htm
|
|

|
Week of October 9 - 15, 2006
|
|
Coming Soon to a Bookstore Near
You – The Entrepreneurial Imperative
| |
BOOK FORUM

See Schramm at
The Entrepreneurial Imperative book forum on Oct. 23rd
at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington DC. For
more information, visit
www.aei.org/event1403 |
A timely, new book, The
Entrepreneurial Imperative: How America's Economic Miracle Will Reshape
The World (And Change Your Life) (HarperCollins), adamantly shows
how America can lead itself on a secure path for long-term expansion,
primarily by supporting its number one, but underutilized, resource:
entrepreneurial capitalism. Author Carl Schramm, president and CEO of
the Kauffman Foundation, has a vision of seeing entrepreneurial
capitalism reign in the United States and abroad. Not only is it his
passionate goal to see a greater expansion of start-ups domestically and
globally, he feels the promotion of entrepreneurial capitalism is a key
formula for bringing about peace, prosperity, and stability in the
world. Schramm, called the “evangelist of entrepreneurship” by The
Economist, explains why America is so good at entrepreneurship and
how it can increase the number of start-ups and move the economy further
away from depending on the “failed trifecta” of big-government,
big-business, big-union. He also argues that spreading entrepreneurship
must be a pillar of US foreign policy – above military and political
solutions.
The Entrepreneurial Imperative: How America's Economic Miracle Will
Reshape The World (and change your life) comes out tomorrow, October
10, 2006. To order a copy, visit
www.entrepreneurialimperative.com.
|
|
Measuring Tech Transfer: Revenues
vs. Deal Flow
The Milken Institute has
released an interesting report that tracks how various universities
perform in terms of biotechnology-related technology transfer and
commercialization. The massive study reviews university performance on
several key metrics: biotechnology-related research publications,
biotechnology-related patenting, and biotechnology-related start-ups and
licensing. Overall, the Milken researchers find that for every dollar
invested in technology transfer offices, a university reaps roughly $6
in licensing income.
Meanwhile, a panel at a recent National Academies event on their
‘Gathering Storm’ report took a look at how to “transition from research
to product”. Several panelists, including Susan Hockfield, the president
of MIT, and Lesa Mitchell of the Kauffman Foundation, cautioned against
focusing too heavily on dollars alone. While the analysis of the data
done on Mind to Market is excellent and provides a detailed look
at the topic of technology transfer office revenue, it does not lend
enough weight to a lesser understood metric of university innovation –
assuring that technologies make their way into the marketplace. The
bottom line? Policymakers and university leaders should focus on the
need to encourage deal flow from universities, as well as the revenue
generated by it.
The 2006 Milken Institute report, Mind to Market: A Global Analysis
of University Biotechnology Transfer and Commercialization, by Ross
DeVol and Armen Bedroussian and others, can be accessed at:
www.milkeninstitute.org/pdf/mind2mrkt_2006.pdf
To listen to the recent Convocation on Rising Above the Gathering
Storm, visit the National Academies website:
www.nationalacademies.org/morenews/20060928.html.
|
|
Eroding Research Ties between
Industry and Academia
A new National Science Foundation study paints a worrying picture about
the state of ties between private industry and America’s leading
research universities. Where has the Money Gone? depicts a new
but pronounced trend of declining private sector investments in US
university-based R&D partnerships. For three decades, the value of these
partnerships grew at a steady pace. Between 1972 and 2001, industry
support to universities and colleges was the fastest growing source of
funds for academic R&D. Since 2001, however, this trend has reversed,
with spending dropping 5.1% over a three-year period. Industrial R&D
spending continues to grow, but less of it is being invested at
universities.
The study also points to a growing concentration of research
investments. While this spending has always been concentrated, the top
100 research universities are capturing a growing share (now at 76% of
the total) of this industrial investment. Finally, the report highlights
two other indicators: a decline in the number of academic articles
co-authored by academic and industry researchers, and a decline in the
number of academic citations found in US industry patent applications.
The Issue Brief does not speculate on the causes of these trends.
To access the September 2006 National Science Foundation Issue Brief,
Where has the Money Gone? Declining Industrial Support of Academic R&D,
visit
http://nsf.gov/statistics/infbrief/nsf06328/
|
|
Chinese Research Spending Booms
Chinese R&D
spending is climbing at the world’s fastest pace, and Asia is becoming a
key player in the international R&D market. These findings come from the
annual assessment of global R&D patterns prepared by Battelle and R&D
Magazine. The study finds that the US still remains the world’s R&D
leader, accounting for 32.4% of global R&D. China now accounts for 13.4%
of the total, and its growth rate far outpaces that of the US. Thanks to
current offshoring trends, Asia is capturing more of the global R&D
market. Overall, Asia now accounts for 35.6% of global R&D. Europe holds
a 23.3% market share. The study researchers expect these patterns to
continue over the next several years. Such trends will be the subject of
future NDE activity, including a trip to Asia next month by NDE’s
Jonathan Ortmans.
To access the 2007 Global R&D Report by Battelle and
R&D Magazine, visit
http://www.battelle.org/news/06/09-29-06Global%20R&D.stm.
|
|
Summary of State Science and
Technology Education Initiatives
While the
Administration and Congress have been reviewing several plans to help
improve science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)
education in the US, the nation’s governors have not been sitting on
their hands. Dozens of states have enacted plans to improve STEM
education in the past year. A new issue brief from the Education
Commission of the States summarizes this work. State governments have
undertaken a number of reform initiatives. These include steps such as
convening state commissions to recommend improvements in STEM education
(7 states), providing grants to STEM educators for innovative education
plans, or providing grants to students (Virginia) or researchers
(Florida) with special expertise in STEM-related fields. The Issue Brief
provides an excellent summary of the state of play in this important
issue area.
To access the September 2006 Education Commission of the States report,
Recent State STEM Initiatives, by Kyle Zeith, visit
http://www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/70/72/7072.pdf.
|
|
A Snapshot of High-Growth Rural
Entrepreneurs
Newspapers,
magazines and other media regularly produce stories about high-growth
entrepreneurs, but most of these stories tend to be about business
owners based in cities or suburban locales. Rural America has lots of
high-growth entrepreneurs, too, but they just don’t get the press of
their urban counterparts. A new study from North Carolina’s Rural
Development Center and the North Carolina Small Business and Technology
Development Center seeks to counter this trend by profiling high growth
companies located in rural North Carolina. The study surveyed more than
1,000 North Carolina-based firms and contains a special focus on firms
that have doubled their sales and/or employment within three years. In
some ways, high growth entrepreneurs are similar to other business
owners. They tend to have more education than the general population,
and they tend to be “do-it-yourselfers,” i.e. they build their
businesses via bootstrapping. But, high growth entrepreneurs do have a
few unique characteristics. They have great optimism about their
business, they have been in business for a longer period (an average of
15 years), and they also have a stronger commitment to focus on clear
business performance goals and measurements. The number one issue for
North Carolina’s high growth entrepreneurs is one that affects all
businesses: finding skilled and talented workers.
The September 2006 North Carolina Rural Development Center report,
Creating Entrepreneurial Communities: Facts about High-Growth
Entrepreneurs in Rural North Carolina, by Catherine Moga Bryant,
Leslie Scott, Carol McLaurin, and Jeff DeBellis, is available at:
http://www.ncruralcenter.org/pubs/highgrowthentrep_09_06.pdf
|
|
The National Dialogue on Entrepreneurship, an initiative of the
Public Forum Institute made possible by a grant from the Kauffman Foundation of Kansas City. Through NDE-news, we bring you
short summaries and analyses of various trends driving the innovation
economy.
Subscribe
now to receive your weekly copy. Archived issues are available
online. Links to the day's entrepreneurship stories from across the nation and around the world are posted each weekday
on the NDE main page
- bookmark it and stay informed about the latest entrepreneurship news.
|
|

|
National Dialogue on Entrepreneurship
2300 M Street, NW; Suite 900
Washington, DC 20037

|
|
All
stories © 2006 The Public Forum Institute
Content from this newsletter may be reproduced for non-commercial
purposes with proper attribution to the National Dialogue on
Entrepreneurship and a link to www.publicforuminstitute.org/nde.
Subscribe:
To
sign up to receive NDE-news, visit www.publicforuminstitute.org/nde/join/
Unsubscribe:
This email was sent to (%Email%).
Unsubscribe
this email address. If you have problems with the automated
process please e-mail Mark
Marich with your email address in the body and your unsubscribe request will be handled promptly. Privacy
Statement:
The Public Forum Institute recognizes and respects the importance of protecting the privacy of all information provided by recipients of our e-mail newsletter. We use a variety of security technologies and procedures to help protect your personal information from unauthorized access, use, or disclosure and will not share personally identifiable information with other companies or organizations. |