|
If you encounter problems viewing this email go to http://www.publicforuminstitute.org/nde/news/nde-news.htm |
||
|
|
||
Week of July 25 - July 29, 2005Welcome to the National Dialogue on Entrepreneurship, an initiative of the Public Forum Institute made possible by a grant from the Kauffman Foundation of Kansas City. Through NDE-news, we bring you short summaries and analyses of various trends driving the innovation economy. Subscribe now to receive your weekly copy. Archived issues are available online. Links to the day's entrepreneurship stories from across the nation and around the world are posted each weekday on the NDE main page - bookmark it and stay informed about the latest entrepreneurship news. |
||
|
Federal Science Dollars: Where Will the Money Go?
While we are still in the
midst of Fiscal Year (FY) 2006, many federal officials are in the thick
of planning for next year’s budgets. Science and technology officials
are no exception. Earlier this month, the White House Office of Science
and Technology Policy provided guidance to federal agencies on R&D
priorities for next year, and the memorandum offers some useful hints
about the Administration’s R&D spending priorities. In addition to
presenting general guidelines for inter-agency collaborative research,
the memo also identifies the “big 3” research spending priorities for
next year: homeland security, the National Nanotechnology Initiative,
and high-end computing and networking. Other hot topics include
understanding complex biological systems, the physical sciences, and
energy and the environment. |
||
|
Strengthening America's Communities Initiative: An Update
In his February 2005 budget
proposal, President Bush recommended a major update of federal economic
development policy under the Strengthening America’s Communities
Initiative (SACI), which has not changed in 40 years. |
||
|
New Fund for African Entrepreneurs
This month’s events around
the G-8 meeting in Scotland and the Live 8 concerts have generated much
discussion about how to eradicate global poverty. Fortunately, these
discussions have not just generated more talk -- concrete proposals are
coming forward, too. The latest example is the East Africa Small
Enterprise Fund, a joint program developed by the Shell Foundation and
GroFin Capital, an Africa-based financial firm. This $100 million fund
will not operate like a typical micro-enterprise fund; it is not
designed to back new start-ups. Instead, the fund is intended for
African entrepreneurs with potential to become important regional and
global players. Entrepreneurs can access the fund for amounts ranging
between $50,000 and $1 million. The fund will begin operations in Uganda
and Kenya, and then roll out to other parts of sub-Saharan Africa. It
represents one of the first times that private financiers and
development agencies have cooperated in a fund that will combine finance
and technical assistance to help nurture African entrepreneurs. |
||
|
Using Economic Performance Measures to Track Government Progress
Entrepreneurs must perform
according to concrete economic performance measures every day: sales,
revenue, productivity, and the like. Federal agencies should do the
same, but this is often easier said than done. A new report from the
Government Accountability Office (GAO) finds that federal government
agencies do a poor job of using economic performance measures to assess
their work and results. GAO convened an expert’s workshop to examine
government agency use of economic performance measures, and how these
assessments could be improved. The panel found that few agencies use
such measures (such as cost-benefit analysis) in developing regulations
or assessing program performance. This shortcoming has many causes, but
is largely due to the fact that agency leaders fail to demand such
measures or to fund such assessments. The failure to effectively assess
performance can be especially dangerous in new program areas such as
homeland security. The panel recommended that federal agencies provide
more support for efforts to assess program results using economic
performance measures. They also suggest that an outside group, such as
the National Academy of Sciences, might consider developing general
guidelines for the federal use of economic performance measures. |
||
|
A Different Take on Entrepreneurial Hotspots
Business Week Online has
taken a different look at entrepreneur-friendly communities. Instead of
simply ranking places that perform well on certain measures, BW Online
has opted to take a closer look at five places that are doing well, but
may not be found at the top of traditional rankings of the “best cities
for business.” The profiled communities are a diverse lot: Medford, OR;
Newark, NJ; Orlando, FL; Provo, UT; and Waitsfield, VT. This list
includes small towns and large metro areas. What does the group have in
common? They tend to be near a major college or university, host a
diverse mix of cultural and recreational activities, and have a strong
infrastructure to support new and growing businesses. According to the
authors, the bottom line is that there is no longer a “recipe” for
supporting and recruiting growing businesses. Each community must
develop its own approach based on unique local assets and competitive
advantages. |
||
|
First UEP center opens in Kansas City
The first pilot program in a
nationwide effort to develop one-stop economic empowerment centers to
support minority entrepreneurship and business development recently
opened in Kansas City, Missouri. This is the first center to launch
through Urban Entrepreneur Partnership (UEP), an initiative of the White
House, National Urban League (NUL), Business Roundtable, and the Ewing
Marion Kauffman Foundation. The Kansas City Urban Entrepreneur Center,
which is being funded and launched by the Kauffman Foundation, will
serve as a model for subsequent UEP pilot centers to be opened as part
of a nationwide program announced last year. Additional cities
designated are Atlanta, Cincinnati, Cleveland, and Jacksonville, with
Milwaukee and Baltimore being explored. |
||
|
House Science Committee Provides Leadership on Tomorrow’s Entrepreneurs
Continuing its recent series of hearings emphasizing the role of federal
policy in promoting entrepreneurial activity, the House of
Representatives Committee on Science last week demonstrated that it
clearly understands the importance of high-growth entrepreneurs and the
“innovation ecosystem.” Recognizing the committee’s lead in focusing
lawmakers’ attention on high-growth entrepreneurship, the committee
chairman Rep. Sherwood Boehlert (R-NY) noted that other members of
Congress need to become more savvy and sensitive to the importance of
innovation and entrepreneurship. His speech was so inspiring, another
committee member joked that “those of us who did not have religion
acquired it.”
A webcast and testimony from
the proceedings is available at: |
||
|
National Dialogue on Entrepreneurship |
||
|
All
stories © 2005 The Public Forum Institute
Subscribe: Unsubscribe: Privacy
Statement: |
||