|
Final Report
Introduction
Business leaders, educators, and workforce development partners
joined Congressman Ralph Hall in a public forum on April 19,
2001 at Austin College in Sherman, Texas to address the
challenges of Workforce Development & the New Economy.
Congressman Hall began the forum by addressing the needs for a
skilled workforce and its importance to the local, state and
national economy. Using a comparison between 1979 and
1998, Congressman Hall presented the earnings differential
between high school and college graduates. In that 20-year
period, the difference in earnings rose from 38 % to 71%.
He challenged the forum participants to come up with ideas on
how to attract new scientists and engineers at a time when
America’s student performance is steadily declining in math
and science. Congressman Hall spoke of the opportunity
available over the next five or six years to make great strides
in workforce development and encouraged attendees to get
involved.
A variety of speakers and panel
discussions filled out the day’s activities. Audience
participation during comment periods and the use of eForum
interactive polling provided important and immediate feedback on
workforce development issues.
OPENING
ADDRESS: The Nature of the Challenge
Dr. W. Michael Cox, Senior Vice President and Chief Economist
for the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas delivered an opening
address complete with facts and statistics describing
America’s movement through the primitive, market, industrial,
and information ages into today’s technological environment.
Dr. Cox discussed America’s world leadership in technology and
our nation's willingness to “let folks lose jobs to grow new
ones. According to Dr. Cox, Americans are
willing to endure the turmoil of job losses to move forward.
The rest of the world however, has had a difficult time
accepting this concept and as a result lags behind the U.S. in
many technological advances. Dr. Cox stressed the
importance of bringing markets and competition to our school
systems. He closed his presentation by comparing the
incentives to build industrial capital (profit) with the need to
design incentives to build intellectual capital.
GUEST
SPEAKER: Educating Tomorrow’s Workforce
Mr. Robert Scott, Director, Public Education Policy, State of
Texas, highlighted continued improvements in the Texas
educational system. State assessment tests, accountability
systems, and improvements in curriculum have made Texas a
national leader in educational accomplishments. Mr. Scott
credited a strong partnership between business and public
schools, Texas grants, the reading and math initiatives, and
school district accountability for many of the state’s
successes in education. Not willing to stand on recent
successes, Mr. Scott emphasized that although things look good,
they can always be better. His words of challenge to the
business and educational leaders were "we want a high
school diploma that has a meaning!”
WORKING
SESSION I: Math and Science Education
Congressman Hall and Dr. James Wilson, Professional Staff
Member, U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Science,
facilitated the session that included presentations by Dr. Neal
Smatresk, Dean of Science, University of Texas at Arlington, and
Mr. Danny Kenney, Vice President of Operations, GlobiTech, Inc,
and a member of the Texoma Workforce Development Board.
Dr. Smatresk expressed his concern of recent movements in
Congress to limit science and research funds and that America,
as a whole, has done a poor job of getting students interested
in science and technology. As a result, Dr. Smatresk
said America has jobs in search of people instead of people in
search of jobs. Mr. Kenney reinforced this assertion from
a business perspective by pointing out the demand for trained
workers exceeds the supply available. Most students,
according to Mr. Kenney, are not aware of the types of jobs that
businesses have to offer them when they finish school. He
felt that business and industry can provide this insight to
students in partnership with educational institutions.
Congressman Hall and Dr. Wilson, along with the two presenters
and forum attendees, continued in a general discussion on ways
to increase student interest in science and math programs.
Exposing students to opportunities and careers in math and
science was the solution most often mentioned by the audience.
Through this general discussion and use of eFORUM, participants
offered feedback on priorities for the federal government in
advancing educational technologies and technical training.
Question:
In your opinion, which is the top
priority for the federal government to advance the effectiveness
and more widespread use of educational technologies and
technical training to better meet worker and business training
needs?
| Lessen
regulatory barriers on training |
19.7% |
| Identify
and facilitate business-education partnership
opportunities, not fund and control them |
12.3% |
| Utilize
early-retired tech-savvy individuals in schools |
5.7% |
| Assist in
development of Math / Science / Technology interactive
learning centers |
9.8% |
| Elimination
of Workforce Investment Act |
0.8% |
| Create
incentives for exchange programs between educational
institutions and business/industry |
41.8% |
| Assist in
the development of publicly accessible computer based
training facilities |
7.4% |
| No role
for federal government |
2.5% |
FEATURE
PRESENTATION: Works in Progress: Identifying Success
Stories
Dr. Michael Hensley, Dean of Workforce Education, Grayson County
College, and Mr. Eric Davis, President of the Sherman Economic
Development Corporation gave a joint presentation on
establishing effective partnerships between workforce
development, industry, education, and economic development.
Dr. Hensley chose
a topic of “Building our Workforce” to emphasize his
position that what we do now is important and can affect us for
years to come. He recommends four courses of action
to other educational institutions:
- Cluster
curriculum around general career areas;
- Develop career
academies inside every school;
- Ensure
policies reinforce workplace values and character
development, and
- Use technology
to support traditional teaching and learning.
Dr. Hensley agreed
with the other forum presenters that finding skilled people to
fill technical positions is a challenge businesses face daily.
He argued that education can be an important partner in solving
this dilemma. According to Dr. Hensley, the role of the
educational institution should be one of a team player,
consensus builder, role model, and change agent.
Mr. Eric
Davis followed Dr. Hensley by telling the audience how a
consortium was developed between the Sherman Economic
Development Corporation (SEDCO), Grayson County College, and the
Texoma Workforce Development Board to build a high-tech training
center in Sherman to support the local industries. After
extensive input from the industries themselves, the consortium
was able to identify the role each partner would play in making
the training center a success. SEDCO would market the center,
Workforce Texoma would find the people, and the college would
provide the training. Funding sources included local
sales taxes, grants, donations from industry, and various
federal and state funding streams. Groundbreaking for the
new center will occur this summer. The 45,000 square foot
structure will include classrooms, labs, conference facilities,
and distance learning.
KEYNOTE
ADDRESS
Congressman Hall introduced Mr. Mike Rawlings, President of
Pizza Hut Inc. Mr. Rawlings got off to a laughing start as
he encouraged attendees to keep eating their lunches because
it’s the nature of his business. Employing over
175,000 people across the nation, Mr. Rawlings admits that you
cannot approach employment in the "same old way."
A 17 year-old employee, making $8.50 per hour is a free agent in
today’s job market just like a high priced sports figure.
The 17 year-old approaches the job with the same “what can you
do for me” attitude as the sports figure does.
Mr. Rawlings said
there are four things every business should do.
- Provide
internal opportunity that is real and not make believe.
Be able to show case histories of workers who advanced in
your company.
- Hold career
fairs to let the public know about your company.
- Benchmark plan
with your people.
- Make careers
important for your employees.
Explaining the
difference between coaching and bossing employees, Mr. Rawlings
stressed that his supervisors and managers are not bosses but
coaches. People feel better about being coached into
something versus being bossed into something. He also
emphasized his Team Together-Team Apart philosophy.
Mr. Rawlings feels employees leave a company because of lack of
recognition not lack of pay. He encouraged businesses to
recognize their people. In closing, Mr. Rawlings credited
Pizza Hut’s success with the concept of everyone lifting each
other up.
WORKING
SESSION II: Business-Education Partnerships
The afternoon working session began with a presentation by Ms.
Stephanie Powers, Director, National School-to-Work
Opportunities Office. Ms. Powers described the
school-to-careers initiative and its value to both students and
industry. Supporting the theme of the session, Ms. Powers
described how business is looking more and more to
school-to-work strategies. Approximately 265,000
businesses are somehow involved in workplace learning
initiatives today. Ms. Powers felt that schools are
more comfortable with the fact that they can’t do it alone
anymore and need proactive business input. Schools, she
said, are referring to their new relationships with businesses
as "strategic alliances." According to Ms. Powers,
"If there is to be an impact in learning, the lessons of
the workplace must be brought into the classrooms."
The session
concluded with panelists Mr. Davis, Dr. Hensley, and Ms. Powers
joining Congressman Hall to discuss hurdles that need to be
overcome in developing business and education partnerships.
Issues such as teachers’ pay, common language and
understanding of technical terms, cultural differences between
education and business, and the need for objective facts and
goal setting topped the list of challenges.
Question:
In your opinion, how critical are
business-education partnerships to the future of math-science
education?
| Not critical |
1.5% |
| Slightly critical |
2.2% |
| Moderately critical |
7.4% |
| Very critical |
36.3% |
| Extremely critical |
52.6% |
|