ABOUT THE FORUM

ACTIVITIES

GET INVOLVED

ISSUES

NEWSROOM

REPORTS

CONTACT

HOME


 

Americans Discuss Health: Conversations in California
Congressman Steve Kuykendall, Honorary Conference Chair
August 30, 2000
Torrance, California

Final Report | Agenda | eFORUM Results | Sponsors
Held at the Torrance Marriott in Torrance, California Congressman Steven Kuykendall hosted a public health forum on August 30, 2000.  Part of a national series, “americans discuss healthtm:  Conversations in California,” local healthcare affiliates met to discuss both regional and national initiatives.  A moderator and multiple speakers instigated dialogue among various healthcare experts through three discussion panels.  Keynote speaker Dr. Hugh Hill, Deputy Director of the HCFA Program Integrity Group, concluded the forum.  Throughout the forum, participants used electronic keypads to register their own opinions regarding particular issues.  These eForums helped tally the opinions present in a statistical format.  Beginning the forum, participants ranked the most crucial reforms needed in the healthcare industry.  The most important was providing healthcare coverage to families without insurance, second was shoring up the solvency of Medicare, followed by the delivery of healthcare to the inner-city, next came making sure HMOs give the care needed, and finally a stricter scrutiny of medical records.  This ranking coincided with how the rest of the nation typically polls.

Congressman Steven Kuykendall initiated welcoming remarks.  He stressed the need of making healthcare accessible to every citizen as six million Americans currently do not receive adequate healthcare.  Those with the most severe health needs many times have the worst coverage, are in the poorest hospital conditions, and often only receive the most costly and retroactive care in an emergency situation.  In Los Angeles, specifically, the uninsured rate is even higher than in most of the nation.  Congressman Kuykendall criticized the Medicaid system whereby those earning just above the cut-off cannot receive any benefits.  Small businesses also pose a problem as they do not always offer coverage in a society where employers cover 2/3rds of healthcare.  Offering a possible solution, he posed helping small business and the self-employed receive health coverage with more affordable premiums. 

OPENING ADDRESS
Dr. Michael Karph, an M.D. at UCLA, provided an opening address on the state of health care today.  With the balanced budget act in place, he urged, it seems no one wants to pay for healthcare, yet the government is paying less than ever.  At UCLA for example, 22 million dollars were lost from Medicare funding in one year.  As the baby boomer generation ages, it seems the government will increasingly want to control healthcare.  According to Dr. Karph, however, this should be done in a way to give money back to the providers.  Employers are seemingly reluctant to serve healthcare needs to their employees, but individuals also show apathy to pay for their own coverage.  Obviously, this rift causes a problem that leaves many Americans uninsured. 

PANEL ONE:  Knowing Your Options -- Access to Health Care in Southern California
Cost proved to be the most critical issue to solving healthcare problems according to this panel.  While paying for coverage poses a problem, the fact remains that people do still need medical help, pointing to the critical nature of healthcare reform.  A need for a long-term policy solution implemented in a timely fashion seemed to be the consensus.  The participants used the eForum to determine the room’s opinion concerning whether the states or federal government should be responsible for finding healthcare solutions.  53% saw a need for the federal and state governments to work together, 25% felt it was the federal government’s responsibility, 13% saw it as the state’s duty, and 9% polled in the other category.

Panelists included Mr. Jonathan Freedman, Director of the L.A. County Department of Health Services; Ms. Pauline Triebenbacher of TRICare; Ms. Mandy Johnson of Community Clinic Association of L.A. County; and Ms. Diana Concannon of the South Bay Free Clinic. 

PANEL TWO:  Medicare and Seniors’ Health
After speeches and discussion, the second panel determined that the current Medicare system suffers because it excludes people from the system.  Looking for solutions, however, Mr. Harper questioned whether the United States is actually ready for a nationalized healthcare system.  He seemed to think a better route would be to tweak the public and private systems, yet still leave them in co-existence. 

How to pay for prescription drugs was another hot topic of the second panel.  Due to the high cost of research to create new drugs, oftentimes only health insurance companies can afford to supply their client with the drug.  While some drug companies provide discounts, this seems to be a growing area of concern.  A few programs exist to aid this problem, but doctors are reluctant to pursue filling out the paperwork to help a patient fund his treatment when the doctor does not get paid for these services. 

The need to implement a mental healthcare coverage also concerned the panel.  General apathy for faith in a government run system arose as government officials are not experts in the field.  Veteran’s care, a government controlled healthcare program for example, leaves much to be desired.  Others noted that, although flawed, the U.S. still possesses the best healthcare system in the world.   A poll conducted at the end of the panel tested how the audience felt about the correlation between better health care and paying higher taxes.  25% were very concerned about increased taxes, another 25% were moderately concerned, and 50% were not concerned.

Ms. Aileen Harper of the L.A. County Center for Healthcare Rights provided an overview about Medicare and seniors’ health.  Panelists included Mr. Ed Cotter from Foundation Health Services, Ms. Marilyn Rafkin of Beach Cities Health District, and  Mr. Maurice Heyerick from HICAP.

PANEL THREE:  Looking into the Future of Health Care 
In an age where people are generally living longer than ever before, Mr. Lilly suggested investigating the point between spending more on healthcare than what is actually being added to one’s value of life.  When looking into the future of healthcare, alternative remedies were closely examined.  While most such practices have been around for centuries, such as using a chiropractor or acupuncture, they are becoming more and more a part of mainstream medicine.  Cigna, for example, actually includes chiropractic services in its coverage.  Also with new technology, there arises new challenges.  Healthcare’s future relies heavily on correctly employing these new technologies.  For example, we can now treat most health issues faster, but the costs have increased dramatically.  Coming up with solutions to these new issues proves crucial to an effective healthcare system. 

Drugs are also on the market now that are of poor quality and some regulation must be implemented to control this distribution.  Education needs to occur so society knows what drugs to buy, what to avoid, and what herbs do not mix with other drugs.  Where one drug may solve a certain problem, over an extended period of time it can sometimes deplete other nutrients within one’s body.  Taking a vitamin supplement can usually solve problems such as this, but a focus on each individual case must be used when dealing with any medical issue.  Oftentimes, the actual amount of herb as boasted on a label is very low or, sometimes, not even present.  In the end, the consumer will determine the future.  And even with technological advancements, society still needs a human component to healing. 

The eForum polling at the end of the session showed that the people in the room used alternative treatments in the following order:  massage the most, herbs second, and chiropractic services third.  Nearly a quarter of the participants felt more alternative therapies would be used if insurance paid for them.  Finally, when picking which disease funding should spend the most money on cancer ranked number one.  Those who selected the “other” category cited more money on prevention and Alzheimer’s disease.

Mr. Scott Syphax of Eli Lilly provided an overview concerning the future of healthcare.  Panelists were Mr. Joseph Dunn, President and CEO of Daniel Freeman Hospitals, Inc.; Dr. Cynthia Watson, M.D. of Family Practice; Dr. James Wang with Cigna Healthcare; and Ms. Asha Shahed of UCLA/Harbor REI.

 

 

ABOUT THE FORUM | ACTIVITIES | GET INVOLVED | ISSUES 
NEWSROOM | REPORTS | CONTACT | HOME
© 2008, The Public Forum Institute. All rights reserved.
The Public Forum Institute
2300 M Street, NW, Suite 900
Washington, DC 20037
Email :: Privacy Policy